Which of these items should be identified on a route map?

When considering what should be identified on a route map, the inclusion of parks is valuable because they serve as recognizable landmarks that can help users navigate. Parks can also serve as points of interest for various activities and are often associated with recreational opportunities. Their placement on a map provides context to the surrounding area, making it easier for individuals to orient themselves and find amenities.

The other options, while potentially relevant in specific contexts, do not provide the same level of general navigational aid for users. For example, cable types are technical details that may not be useful to someone simply trying to understand the route. Neighboring states could provide some geographical context, but they typically do not enhance the immediate utility of a route map for navigation purposes within a specific area. Utility poles, although important in terms of infrastructure, do not contribute to the navigational experience like parks do, as they are not typically landmarks that enhance journey planning or awareness.

In sum, the presence of parks on a route map aids in navigation and enhances user experience by offering familiar reference points in the environment.